Posted by: mchuey | 14 January, 2008

Skewing the Basic Facts of Scripture

jkm-10.jpgby J.K. McKee

I was recently talking to a Messianic friend of mine who had just attended church over a week ago while visiting relatives out of town. This church is fairly large, with several Sunday services that serve well over a thousand in attendance. The service lasts one hour. There are some announcements, some praise songs, and then the pastor puts his Bible down on a barstool and speaks off-the-cuff for twenty minutes. Everything he says, as far as I was told, was spoken spontaneously.

Last week, this pastor apparently was speaking on the encounter of Yeshua with the teachers in the Temple complex (Luke 2:41-42). This is certainly a familiar scene for many of us, as Joseph and Mary’s family had visited Jerusalem to celebrate the Passover, and on their way back to Galilee they notice that Yeshua is not with their traveling party. They have to turn around and go back to Jerusalem to find Him.

The pastor, trying to make a joke I assume, flippantly declared how concerned Mary must have been for the young Jesus—only twelve—being in the Temple. She would have been ranting at Joseph and haggling him, no different than any Twenty-First Century American housewife, at why he let Him get away.

As it was reported to me, why would Jesus want to have been in the Temple, anyway? Surely he was too young at the age of twelve to have been there. The pastor said that Mary would have asked Joseph, “Why couldn’t you have let Him wait until He was 16?!”

Upon hearing this, my Messianic friend did not know what to do. Did this pastor really not prepare his sermon for Sunday? Or did he really not understand First Century Judean Jewish culture?

For us as Messianics, this is an easy one. The ages of twelve to thirteen were the time when Jewish boys would traditionally be bar mitzvahed and acknowledged as responsible members of the community. Even the venerable NIV Study Bible—surely a resource this pastor has in his library—recognizes this:

“At age 12 boys began preparing to take their places in the religious community the following year” (NIV Study Bible, p 1572).

Yeshua’s words to Mary, “Why is it that you were looking for Me? Did you not know that I had to be in My Father’s house?” (Luke 2:49) were entirely appropriate. Our Lord was being properly prepared for His future adult ministry, already developing a reputation with the Jerusalem Rabbis. Yet, as the pastor paraphrased Him, “Mother, didn’t you know I would be in church?”

It can be pretty easy to criticize Christian pastors for making errors like these—even though many pastors would in fact, prepare their sermons in advance. This pastor, however, did not prepare his sermon. But what happens when similar errors are seen in the Messianic community?

I was also recently handed a newsletter from a major Messianic organization. The lead article in this newsletter spoke on some of the significance of Chanukah for us as the Messianic community. In the article, its author spoke about the parallels that exist between the story of the Maccabees and the Last Days. Then appeared this paragraph:

“The days were very similar to those described by Timothy. However, by Timothy’s time the days of Antiochus Epiphanes were long past and Israel was now under Roman rule. Timothy was writing about the last days, days that we have not yet seen…”

When I read this paragraph, I honestly did not know what to do. Part of me wanted to laugh, part of me wanted to scream, and part of me wanted to clean my glasses to check that I had read this properly. A very glaring error had been made.

There was no passage of Scripture referenced to in this article regarding the Last Days, but I am assuming that it is 2 Timothy 3:1-5:

“But realize this, that in the last days difficult times will come. For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, revilers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self-control, brutal, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, holding to a form of godliness, although they have denied its power; avoid such men as these.”

But what was the problem with what was said? It is very clear for anyone who has read either 1 or 2 Timothy: “Timothy was writing…” I have a feeling that the author of this Messianic article failed to read 2 Timothy 1:1-2:

“Paul, an apostle of Messiah Yeshua by the will of God, according to the promise of life in Messiah Yeshua, To Timothy, my beloved son: Grace, mercy and peace from God the Father and Messiah Yeshua our Lord.”

Or for that same matter, 1 Timothy 1:1-2:

“Paul, an apostle of Messiah Yeshua according to the commandment of God our Savior, and of Messiah Yeshua, who is our hope, To Timothy, my true child in the faith: Grace, mercy and peace from God the Father and Messiah Yeshua our Lord.”

One does not have to go very far to see what the problem is; the Apostle Paul is author of 1&2 Timothy. Certainly, there are liberal theologians who believe that the Pastoral Epistles of 1&2 Timothy and Titus are all Deutero-Pauline, meaning that Paul did not write them. But I have never heard about Timothy writing to himself. I sincerely hope that the reference to “Timothy was writing…” was just an omission on the part of the Messianic writer, and this mistake just did not get caught in time among proofreaders in his office.

In all candor, though, these are the kinds of mistakes that we would expect second graders in Sunday School to make—not grown men who lead Messianic organizations.

Some people may wonder at times why our ministry is a stickler when it comes to details. Well, if a Jewish person were in attendance at the church, hearing that the young Yeshua in the Temple complex at twelve was a bad thing, he or she would think that the pastor did not know what he was talking about as it was clearly connected to His bar mitzvah. It could seriously turn the person off to hearing the gospel! At the same time, passing on an inaccurate statement about Timothy writing the letters that Paul actually wrote to him, does not exactly help Messianic credibility, either.

Click here to order!Are you concerned about the basic facts of Scripture? I hope so! If you are, then remember that Outreach Israel Ministries and TNN Online are always in the process of producing new, cutting edge educational materials (including commentaries) that can help you in your distinct Messianic walk. I would highly recommend that if you have not done so already, you purchase a copy of our Survey of the Apostolic Scriptures for the Practical Messianic study, including an MP3 audio CD with lectures. Be informed about the discussions that have been going on for decades in the realm of Biblical composition. Do not get caught unaware when skewed facts are passed along, be they by a Christian pastor or even a Messianic leader.

Responses

Shalom brother McKee:
While I certainly agree that we are behooved to acurately quote scripture, and that details are important, I really think this minor error on the part of our Messianic brother should be forgiven, and even understood. I can see myself making this mistake. It seems like such a simple thing to do. Maybe it is because age is catching up with me and my mind does not allways serve me well.
If the mistake had been one which would lead one into error, it should by all means be made public in a very precise manner. However, to draw attention to others failures when no ones soul has been endangered by the error seems to be a little harsh to me. But, that is only my opinion. I like to err on the part of compassion rather than risk harming a ministry or a brother.
May you be richly blessed in your service to our Savior Yeshua HaMashiach.
David

*****

JKM: No one’s intention is to harshly criticize anyone, but correcting the obvious error that Timothy wrote 1&2 Timothy is one of the many Messy-antics thar our movement suffers from today. Do notice how I qualified my remarks:

“I sincerely hope that the reference to ‘Timothy was writing…’ was just an omission on the part of the Messianic writer, and this mistake just did not get caught in time among proofreaders in his office.”

Yet in all honesty, if a proofreader did not catch this one, it speaks volumes of an aprofessionalism that needs to be dealt with in our movement. Messianics are certainly quick to judge this kind of aprofessionalism when it manifests itself in the Christian Church; but we really need to learn how to get our own act together first.

John, you hit the nail on the head again. There is so much erroneous teaching (intended or not) out there and the sheep are “dying from the lack of knowledge. Having sid that, many sheep don’t really want to excert themselves and search the Scripture.

For over 10 years I was in a church setting where Scripture was used to further the agenda of the pastor. “Liberty” was the catch phrase, which meant it was just fine to go dancing, abuse alcohol, watch all sorts of movies and videos. I stayed because my husband was an elder and member of the band. When I spoke up that the lifestyle and preaching were lacking Scriptural basis I was “blackballed” and called “legalistic”.

I should have left and saved myself a lot of spiritual and emotional abuse, but you kow what it says about hindsight.

Speaking of erroneous teaching. I recently heard of a well-know Texas preacher who wrote a book in which he states that the Jews don’t need Yeshua as savior because they have a covenant with God (dual covenant theory). The book was published by Strang and even though the editors brought this to the attention of the publisher and the author, neither Strang nor the author made a change in the book.

One does not have to be a bible scholar to understand that his teaching is pretty close to being anti-Christ. This man is a household name in christian circles and I wonder how much damage is he doing to the christian community, let alone to the outreach to Jews.

That is one of the reasons why I am so thankful for your ministry. Your teaching is clear and easy to follow up to make sure you are teaching rightly. The closer we are coming to the end, the more important it will be to be holding on to the Word. Proverbs 3 is such a strong and excellent expression about adhering to the Word.

Thanks again for all the work that you do.

Dagmar

*****

JKM: Pastor John Hagee’s new book In Defense of Israel addresses his (new?) belief that Yeshua was not the Messiah of Israel, but the Savior to the world. It has certainly caused a great deal of commotion in both the evangelical and Messianic worlds–and many have rightly condemned him. My feeling is that Hagee, in wanting to “love” Israel and the Jewish people, is going way overboard in failing to recognize that Jewish people need salvation too. As Paul reminds, us, “not all Israelites truly belong to Israel” (Romans 9:6, NRSV).

Dear Mr. McKee,

Could you please shed some light on Melchizedek? It appears some are basing a whole theology on who he is? Some say Yeshua? One person I know says there’s a line of 24 Melchizedek princes starting with Adam. Is this true? What source can he be getting this from. He also mentioned “the Ancients”. Can you tell me more?

Thank you,
Debra

*****

JKM: We discussed Melchizedek in our Hebrews study a little over a year ago. Melchizedek is an elusive figure in the Bible, and from that mystery the author of Hebrews asserts, “He is without father or mother or genealogy, and has neither beginning of days nor end of life, but resembling the Son of God he continues a priest for ever” (Hebrews 7:3, RSV). While this verse has been interpreted by some Christologically, the author of Hebrews is simply making mention of the fact that there is no geneaology of Melchizedek given in the Torah, nor is there a reference to his birth or death. The key more than anything else is that his priesthood resembles the current priesthood of Yeshua. To say anything more is to go beyond the text. Melchizedek was not Yeshua the Messiah, but was rather a human being just like Abraham who served the One God and whose service foreshadowed His current service before the Father in Heaven.

Dear Mr. McKee,

Do you have an article on your website regarding “shatnez” or the mixing of wool and linen? If not, can you give me your take on this? Is it just wool (animal) and linen (plant) that shouldn’t be mixed or the mixing of any two fibers together in our clothing? How do synthetic fibers relate to this as well?

Thanks,
Debra

*****

JKM: As with many regulations in the Pentateuch, such commandments need to be first understood against the backdrop of their Ancient Near Eastern context, before we can (or even should) apply them for today. The following FAQ on our TNN website covers the subject of mixed fibers:

http://www.tnnonline.net/faq/m.html#Mixed%20Fibers

Two questions:

1) We light the Sabbath candles but I’m wondering if it is okay to do so. The Hebrew for kindle “ba’ar” seems to define a continual burning, something consumed as a candle would be during Sabbath. What do you think about this please?

2) Masks for Purim. I never like the dressing up because it seemed to mimic Mardi Gras and especially the violation of Torah of a man dressing as a women as is so often done in Purim plays. Is any kind of dressing up for Purim okay, even if just a mask of Esther, Mordecai, etc…?

Thanks,
Debra

*****

JKM: Speaking for myself, I am very philo-traditional in my approach to Messianic faith. For the most part, I have no problem with mainline Jewish traditions as they concern lighting Shabbat candles, or having a Purim play. Have some of these things been embellished in some Jewish communities? Yes. I recommend that one always filters Jewish tradition via Paul’s words of Philippians 4:8: “whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things.”

Our Messianic Helper Series addresses the various customs and traditions associated with both Shabbat and the Spring Holidays (including Purim).

Dear JKM,

I don’t see anything on your website regarding the Star of David. Just wondering what you thought about it, along with the Messianic (Star of David, Menorah, fish) symbol? Would you say they are “kosher”?

Thanks,
Debra

*****

This is a topic that I plan to address in the forthcoming Torah In the Balance, Volume II. This work will actually have a number of hot topics addressed, including: divisions that take place during the Biblical holidays, human sexuality, and the significance of religious symbols. As you can imagine, some of these things have be considered very carefully. I originally planned to have this finished sometime in 2005, but now we’re in 2008. It would be released at the very earliest in 2009!

There are people in the Messianic community on a witchhunt when it comes to the subject of religious symbols, who do not demonstrate a great deal of forebearance or maturity when it comes to this issue. Just consider some of the Messianic views out there regarding the cross–which if people want to acknoledge it or not–was what our Lord was crucified upon. The following FAQ addresses this in greater detail:

http://www.tnnonline.net/faq/c.html#Crucifixion

I hope this gives you a frame of reference by which to consider some of the other religious symbols.

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories